There are many controversial opinion when it comes to discuss about the profound influences of the internet as well as smartphones to people interaction in the modern life. In my perspective according to this issue, its merits are more than demerits and I will shed the light in the upcoming paragraphs.
The primary downside of the advent of technology such as internet and cellphones is that it can facilitate people to reduce face-to-face meeting frequency and eventually, to be absent-minded of physical interaction. Indeed, the contemporary period witnesses the regular of using smart gadgets as the communication method between people, hence declines the numbers of times that that have meetings in real life. This undoubtedly is an explicit cause of how people lack the norm reactions with each others in an traditional talk such as hugging or handshaking. More severely, numerous people have struggled in dealing with their emotional behaviours in chatting conventionally, which stems from the dramatical widespread of the online world.
Despite the negative impact of internet and mobile phones to the way people communicate, it is likely to bring certain upsides. To commence with, the growth of electronic media ’s users, follows by the pile-up numbers of applications, which has became an optimal choice for people to make long-distance video calls. In fact, there are a large proportion of people who live far apart from their home can assimilate themself in to their family by only a touch, or the urgent conference between countries can be promptly executed in the same way, either. The second merit which should be highlighted is that internet, especially social networking sites, are playing a pivotal role in assisting people to manage relationships efficiently. Because of the hectic pace of city life, people with tight schedules have to cover their networks. However, by only a few minutes of reacting emojis using social networking sites like facebook or zalo, the bond among people can be strengthened frictionlessly.
In conclusion, even though there is obvious detrimental effect of communicating in the digital world, I adamantly believe that the pros of this development exceeds its cons.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparis 88
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. 89
- Internet Users as percentage of population 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...le, hence declines the numbers of times that that have meetings in real life. This undoub...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the norm reactions with each others in an traditional talk such as hugging or han...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...e-up numbers of applications, which has became an optimal choice for people to make lo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, so, then, well, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35327635328 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0251849362 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618233618234 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9776393409 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.538461538 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15512946419 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540379006805 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412631781168 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813640311504 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303785548371 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.