Today more and more people are using mobile phones and
Internet. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
In order to ease life’s chaos, man his preceded his abilities to an extent, that technology is a matter of existential crisis. Nowadays, people are so engrossed with their smartphones that they conveniently ignore others around them, and miss out on the beauty of small things in life.
Unlike old times, worldly population have become less social. Traditions such as the celebration of festivals with family and friends are falling apart. It is surprising that nuclear families living together, don’t make time for each other. Lack of communication leads to misunderstandings and differences. This is also responsible for shaping personalities of young individuals in their former years of growing up.
Mobile phones, which were once a luxury, is now a necessity even to a school child. Tech-savvy millennials are often found wasting time browsing the internet or playing games, absolutely unproductive. Socializing apps encourage meeting strangers, failing to foster bonds with those coming across in our daily lives. Deceived by the temporary excitement, they choose to stay deprived of the wonders of nature and the chances of meeting interesting people. For example, the reluctance to introduce ourselves to our new neighbours.
A large populous is observed to use their cell phones mostly for texting or for work purpose. Professionals stuck in the rat race to higher goals are living an unbalanced life, where they have no emotional or moral support to combat a stressful situation. The fast-paced life is attractive but success mostly comes with the burden of loneliness.
Social obligations of sharing selfies, locations and other personal information on social media are getting competitive. So much so, that people are engaged on their phones while traveling, eating and even while driving. Resulting in higher rates of accidents, suicides, diseases, and mental illness, in comparison to a few decades ago. It is observed that people struggle to hold a dialogue in person, as they are too accustomed to their “supposedly interesting life” on the internet.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that the people are losing their ability to communicate with those around them, as they spend most of their time with their heads buried into their mobile phones. I suggest that a conscious effort should be made by each one to a meaningful life, as you live only once!
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?Give rea 56
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course.You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letterdescribe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action yo 84
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write a 84
- You would like to participate in a work-related seminar in another country.Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation, and cost. 78
- Some people say all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons, include relevant examples from your own knowledge an 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34300791557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98548550328 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635883905013 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5667338832 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974266893872 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233856269719 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323023484785 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503199045317 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377150815888 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.