Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farm that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers. Would the advantages of this outw

Essay topics:

Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farm that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers. Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Of course, reducing the import from alien countries is a debatable topic over many years. Some opine that this assertion will positively benefits many local farmer and also the environment while others oppose this view. This essay will evaluate both these assertions and reach at a sensible conclusion.

To begin with, by regulating free flow of food items, many a farmer, who is generally sidelined from the mainstream society in this industrialist era, gets an equal stake to be the part of a nation's development, for many countries completely rely on overseas food export rather than uplifting their already diminishing agriculture sector. Apart from that burning of fossil fuel can be reduced up to an extent by curtailing transportation of these food items; thus, catastrophic environmental pollution can be limited in this respect.

On the other hand, relaying solely on domestic agricultural products, no country can fulfill the ever increasing demand of nourishment. To elaborate, commonly different countries have different geographical features, and, thus, they are varied in the availability of natural resources resulting in the inequality in their food reserve. For example, Singapore, a country with total land area of 712 km and overall population of 50 lakhs, cannot survive without import from various part of the world. In addition to that it opens door many a man to acquire jobs in all sectors: primary, secondary, tertiary in way of not only production but also transportation of these food products.

TO sum up, although import of sustenance from all the world over has a few blemishes, especially some environmental concern, a nation cannot persist alone by its own entirely cutting down export, furthermore, it provides jobs for people of all walks of life and is a blessing for many countries. As such, it is not appropriate to limit the scope of this kind positive development.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-29 SamNiz 89 view
2019-10-26 eppa akhil 78 view
2019-10-25 fovage 89 view
2019-09-15 marukap 73 view
2019-09-13 Rakap 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...ine that this assertion will positively benefits many local farmer and also the environm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...gets an equal stake to be the part of a nations development, for many countries complet...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, in addition, of course, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27124183007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99738056147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643790849673 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.8120726591 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.636363636 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181824120854 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590332251186 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401850266923 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102175327453 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306302358993 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.