Tourism has caused environmental problems in many parts of the world. What sort of problems has been caused and what can be done about them?
The tourism industry has been booming swiftly over the past decades. Even though tourism provides a great deal of revenue for many countries, it brings umpteen environmental hazards mainly air pollution and disposal of solid wastes. This situation can be managed by awareness to public and implementing laws.
Principal problem associated with tourist activity is pollution of air. This is to say, transportation has become an inextricable factor in this industry, and people start to explore new places more and more. This invites a large scale burning of fossil fuels and therefore, poisonous gases emit into the atmosphere. As a result, atmospheric temperature begins to rise and make the planet not suitable for life in. For instance, a recent study in India shows that the content of CO is alarmingly high in major tourist places. Accumulation of non-bio-degradable materials is another dire consequence of global tourism in which trippers throw solid residues at places they visit. It disturbs the equilibrium of ecology either. Coral bleaching in the Pacific region is a perfect example for this pressing issue.
A viable solution to tackle this menace is public education on mass media. This must include the reasons for environmental distress and aftermaths of such imprudent actions. This strategy creates an impression among the citizens about the necessities of exercising safe and efficient methods that reduce the implications on the planet. As an illustration, education programmes through short films made a significant impact on curbing the use of plastic items in Malaysia. Furthermore, an outright ban on private vehicles in ecologically fragile areas would increase the dependence of public transportation systems and eventually enhance the quality of air.
On the whole, environmental damage is an inevitable byproduct of tourism; however, it can be deterred by educating the public and stringent actions against the operations of private automobiles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51973684211 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08534395152 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0265066769 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7058823529 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988317320259 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291151009675 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036379274421 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722881015031 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467623000874 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.