Tourism is becoming popular these days due to various reasons. Some people think that it supports the economy of the countries Whereas, others believe that it has a negative impact on the natural environment. This essay will discuss both of these, how tourism brings wealth to countries and why it is damaging natural resorts.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of tourism. One of the most conspicuous is it pump-in money by creating jobs. In particular, it supports hotels and transportation industry. For example, A meticulous research study conducted by eminent scientists of the University of Australia shows that the number of employees in the service industry is positively correlated with tourist coming in for the visit. Thus, tourism is supporting and building stronger economies.
On the other hand, one of the pivotal arguments against is people who come into tourism do not care much for the environment. In particular, they threw plastic bottles and other packaging materials which is harmful for pristine condition. For instance, a longitudinal study conducted by prominent researchers claims that pollution exponentially rises as the number of tourists grows. In fact, they are directly proportional.
This essay discussed how tourists, money, and the environment are interrelated. In conclusion, with proper social awareness, the benefits of tourism can outweigh the drawback.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46082949309 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00941771087 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4037020004 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6428571429 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634810582353 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228637042656 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250101093437 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396581789684 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105374505678 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.