In today's era, one would agree that using a hand phone excessively is often compared to chain smoking. Moreover, use of a mobile device is no less that an addiction, similar to that of smoking in public places. In this essay, I'll try to elaborate on how frequent use of mobile devices is the same as smoking cigarettes.
Not quite recently, but at least two decades ago cellphones were invented. Since then, they have had a huge impact on humanity. Over the past years technology has advanced in leaps and bound, which also led to the evolution of the internet and social media. Applications such as facebook and instagram helps us connect to people over the web. Almost nine out of every ten individual will be using these application to connect with friends and family, as well as play online games. When they wakeup in the morning, the first thing they reach out to is their cellphone, to check out facebook feeds or either check how many likes they have received over any picture or video they have posted. Some are quite active on these apps that they almost share thier lives over it which sometimes maked them victims to cyber crimes or bullying. This is a very serious issue and can cause depression to an indivdual, and sometimes also to life threatening decisions.
We are quite aware about smoking addiction and its adverse effects on health. I do not see mobile usage addiction any differently as smoking. In fact, it is much more severe issue than smoking because affects both, physical and mental health. Depresssion, rage and other physcological disturbances can lead to various consequesnces. Furthermore, usage of mobiles should be moderated or regulated by the national authority atleast in certain public places.
Therefore, I support the ban of usage of mobile devices in public places specifically schools and other educational institution.
- Many employees work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only worker and not employers benefits from it. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat. Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letterexplain the reasons for the noiseapologize for inconveniencedescribe what action you will take 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people encourage young children to leave their parents house as soon as they become adults while other say children should stay at their parents house as long as possible.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 84
- You have heard about plans to build new apartments in a public park near your home. You want to give your opinion about this.Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper. In your letterExplain how you learnt about these plansSay what you thi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...moking in public places. In this essay, Ill try to elaborate on how frequent use of...
^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...ng in public places. In this essay, Ill try to elaborate on how frequent use of mob...
^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... huge impact on humanity. Over the past years technology has advanced in leaps and bo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this application' or 'these applications'?
Suggestion: this application; these applications
...t of every ten individual will be using these application to connect with friends and family, as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, at least, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98402555911 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67269153049 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635782747604 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5559892803 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7647058824 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211217703172 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590963665776 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694615608969 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139476638022 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760301793429 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.