A growing number of parents are skeptical about the effectiveness and safety of childhood immunization. These people claim that vaccinations are hazardous to children’s health and as such are not needed. Despite the fact that there are some potential risks of having children inoculated against life-threatening diseases, I strongly disagree with the idea of seeing vaccination as unnecessary and perilous to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, children should get vaccinated because immunization can protect them from fatal diseases and prolong their lives. Owing to advances in medical science, tens of thousands of children around the world can be safeguarded against more deadly diseases than ever before. Some infectious diseases that once injured or killed thousands of children have been completely eliminated and others are close to extinction. Polio, a crippling and potentially deadly infectious disease, is one example of the great impact that vaccines had on Canadian children. Polio was once Canada’s most-feared disease, causing death and permanent paralysis across the country. However, thanks to vaccination, there are no reports of polio in Canada now.
In addition, vaccines are safe for children because they must undergo extensive clinical trials, pass many safety tests and get approval before they are given to people. For example, when a new vaccine is ready to be tested in people, it is first given to a few people to check the dose and its safety. It is then given to larger numbers, such as hundreds or thousands of people, to make sure it is safe and effective. If one participant in this lengthy and meticulous examination is reported to have harmful side effects, this vaccine will be permanently banned from the public. Even if a vaccine has been approved for use, its safety is periodically monitored by specialists at health departments.
To recapitulate, it is imprudent to repudiate childhood vaccination and consider it unnecessary and unsafe. Vaccines approved for use are credited with saving millions of people’s lives and preventing outbreaks of deadly diseases a year worldwide. People who are against vaccination have a flawed understanding of this preventive measure and underestimate the positive effects that vaccines may have on children. In my opinion, vaccinating children is an absolutely imperative and safe despite the small and occasional risk involved.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 56
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...e of the great impact that vaccines had have on Canadian children. Polio was once Ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... tested in people, it is first given to a small number of people to check the dose and its safety...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43832020997 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0640433887 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580052493438 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3664439408 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212607528977 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663857319124 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497617465456 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140500609548 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556664298128 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.