Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do u agree or disagree?
It is often argued by many that rich nations should provide humanitarian aid to unwealthy ones at the time of natural calamities. This essay agrees with the statement as wealthy countries have all the resources to help and this would also help in establishing a better relation with each other in future.
Developed countries have abundant resources and money available. They have superior infrastructure, along with latest tools and technology which can help economically weaker countries. Not only sharing their infrastructure would help in various life saving rescue operations but donating a little wealth from their economy would be considered as a major contribution in helping the nation in need. Take for example, a rich nation could help by providing their helicopters for saving lives in danger, food for the hungry and homeless and money for the poor.
Additionally, help from prosperous nations to the poor countries could help in flourishing a stronger relationship among each other. The country in need could, in near future, help by easing out paper formalities to travel between both the countries. Moreover, they could provide relaxation in foreign tax and trade policies. This would lead to a stronger bond among the nations involved. A clear example is when Japan was hit by tsunami, Vietnam came forward providing all the help to Japan. In return Japan lowered all the taxes on the products imported from Vietnam.
In conclusion,with the availability of ample resources both in terms of infrastructure and finance, as well as a step in building a better relationship rich countries should definitely come forward to help poor nations in natural disaster.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do u agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...shing a better relation with each other in future. Developed countries have abundant r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...hey have superior infrastructure, along with latest tools and technology which can help eco...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
... imported from Vietnam. In conclusion,with the availability of ample resources bot...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29104477612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9376076785 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5702823208 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154948925476 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564876750036 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545685071494 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120070311377 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718538195039 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.