Wearing fashionable clothes is becoming important today. Is this a positive or negative development?
Having dressed up in stylish outfit has become fundamental aspect in recent times. Even though some people find it a positive move, I firmly hold a belief that the trend of wearing voguish clothes is disadvantageous approach.
It is easy to comprehend why I consider this trend is a negative growth. Inclination towards the clothes in fashion not only leads to cultural erosion but also broadens the gap between affluent and destitute people. Once people started wearing trendy attire, they no longer give preference to their traditional customs; consequently, cultural dresses are losing their popularity. Being clad in stylish outfits, individuals try to exhibit their wealth. This practice, in turn, develops the ill-feelings between rich and poor class people. Thus, the appeal of putting on fashionable dresses is a destructive evolution to a large extent.
Meanwhile, there are some mortals who think that such appeal is an affirmative growth. They maintain that if voguish clothes are not used and produced, the fashion industry will get collapsed; resultant, workers who are working in such industry will end up being unemployed. Why to shut down fashion industry when it offers notable job opportunities to an overwhelming majority of people? For example, fashion shows organized in Paris provide work opportunities to designers, models and event organizers. Thus, to the mind of these people, it is beneficial from employment perspective.
Conclusively, despite the fact that the craze of trendy clothes has raised employment rate, I acknowledge that being fashionable results in depriving of cultural attire and causes inferior complexity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | seidat010@ | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ng duc minh | 61 | view |
- You live at university accommodation You found that some valuables were stolen from your room Write a letter to accommodation manager about this theft In your letter Introduce yourself Describe what happened Write what you want from the accommodation mana 32
- Your friend has offered to sell you something Write a letter to the friend In your letter include What the item is Questions requesting details of the item being sold What price you think is fair 82
- In many countries government spend a lot of money in improving internet access. Why is it happening? Do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 81
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97136403511 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6917747479 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222035336996 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602548711661 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429213237822 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116127422387 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407707073347 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.