Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Some people say that it is right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender. WHAT is your opinion?
The predominant social convention that males and their female counterparts are unequal in some features has always been a point of debate. Some people believe that excluding one gender from performing certain occupations is mandatory due to such diversity in some traits. I entirely disagree with this statement.
For one, women have proven to show some superiority in some positions that used to be dominated by men in the past. Recent researches conducted that women have greater multi-tasking abilities when compared to men, which means that they can perform more than one perfectly at the same time. This significant feature has been exploited in the past twenty years by a vast number of enterprises which opt for hiring women in critical positions, and women hit the glass ceiling of such positions. One salient example is Christine Lagarde, the president of the International Monetary Fund, who has been occupying this position successfully since 2014. Thus, if males were of remarkable leading capabilities than females, then we would not witness the progression of women in higher positions.
In addition, it is true that men can achieve considerable progress in some fields that may require a great deal of passion and patience, such as bringing up well-bred children. In the past, it was mistakenly believed that males are not able to rear their children as this mission involves the love and passion of a mother; however, society is now witnessing a prolific increase in the number of children who are being raised by their fathers. Most of those children are scoring significant development academically and socially according to plenty of surveys. None of these achievements would have been possible without the males being able to support their children emotionally despite the absence of the mother.
To conclude, despite the abundant believe that both genders should be treated differently due to some variation in their characteristics, I hold the notion that such belief is a stereotype which ought to be expelled from societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | hany mohamed | 84 | view |
- Social media has completely changed the way family and friends communicate with each other WHAT are the reasons for this IS this a positive or negative development 92
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. DO you agree or disagree? 78
- A pet belonging to a friend of yours recently passed away Write a letter to console your friend In your letter include Your condolences What kind of animal it was Something you think will raise your friend s spirits 81
- Write a letter to your local library suggesting something they could do to improve their facility In your letter include a recount of a poor experience you had what you feel the library should change why you feel the library needs alteration Begin your le 84
- The government’s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. TO what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...er. To conclude, despite the abundant believe that both genders should be treated dif...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2462006079 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87967574642 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1572332857 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211355546203 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719861913239 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596761147513 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131898794789 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524582276183 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.