In today's modern world, with its galloping progress in technology, movie makers are becoming more sophisticated than ever before. They produce variouse types of movies such as comedy, fantacy and many others. On the other hand, some movies are baced on books that one controversial question arises in this regard, whether its better to read the book before watching the movie or not. Some people prefer to watch movie first but others perefer opposite way. In my perspective, watching movie before reading book is suitable. I feel this way for some reasons which are pinpointed in the following.
To begin with, these days, movies and books are both attractive and appealing to many people in the world. Moreover, movies are baced on books can provode more information due to the dialogs are related to the book so they are more valuable and persice. But, to have more fun and joy during the watching these kinds of movies its vital not to read the book before. When people read the book first, they are compeletly familare with the concepts and details which it leads to be less suprise in movie's scenses. For instance, once i read a book which called, game of therons, after that i watch the series. During the watching that series i didn't enjoy in comparison to read that book.
Additionaly, books offer many details for events and characters which is not possible for movies since movie makers encounter with many challengs to produce a movie. Therefore, sometimes the movie can not illustrate some items which are pinpointed in the book. So by watching move second, people are seeking for that charactristics that are not in the movie. As a result, may people think that the movie is not accurate as the book is. To illustrate my piont, movie makers can not display any character that is more that 3 meters tall bot in the book its easy to talk about that.
In a nutshell, by taking account all the above reasons and many others, i strongly believe that watching the movie first, then reading the related book since not to miss suprising parts and details.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- do you think that public speaking should be a requirement for students? why? 78
- do you think that public speaking should be a requirement for students? why? 80
- 33 3
- 2 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e in movies scenses. For instance, once i read a book which called, game of thero...
^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ich called, game of therons, after that i watch the series. During the watching t...
^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ries. During the watching that series i didnt enjoy in comparison to read that book. ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to miss suprising parts and details.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80167597765 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40627340106 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488826815642 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9888002279 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.