4 days worker
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the 4 days work week will beneficial to the company as well as the employee as a whole. The former argues that this will have a great impact on the company and individual in three specific ways but the latter counters each of the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading contends that a reduced workweek would increase the benefit of the company as they have to pay only the 80% of the full-time employee and also hire more employees and this will create an overall less amount of error to the output of the company. In contrast, the lecturer argues that 4 days workweek require more investment of the company as the health cost is needed for more employee. Moreover, the training for the extra new employee will also add extra cost and will cut off the profit of the company.
Secondly, the author contends that this 4-days workweek will decrease the unemployment rate of the country since more and more people will be required to fill the other days for the company. However, the lecture rebuts that, this may not work since the company may offer overtime for the existing employee. Moreover, the situation can be even worse by raising the unemployment rate since the company will likely hire those people who want to work 5 days.
Finally, the text claims that the 4-days workweek will enhance the life quality of the employee since they can spend more time with their family and can do their own interest. On the other hand, the listening counters that, while the employee will get more time for leisure, this reduces the life quality of the people since the job market become more unstable and if a sudden economic crash happens, the 4-days worker will likely to lose their job first. He further adds that the company will continuously be looking for 5 days workers for their important position like managing director to have continuous and consistent discussion making for the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 61 | view |
- a 3
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 86
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 60
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.(3) 50
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75953079179 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28349167768 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480938416422 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3638686692 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.545454545 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.6045352989 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8181818182 5.45110844103 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165801039186 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714613983988 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703344615375 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101594953331 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633190793623 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.