43: teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect
In this regret, I prefer to wait until the class is over and after that talk to the professor. There are a couple of reasons in support of my idea. Firstly, maybe the teacher correct what he said after a while. Secondly, this is not polite to interrupt the class and disrupt other students. I will elaborate my reasons and try to shed some light on my perspective through ample examples.
The first exquisite point to mention is that sometimes teachers mistakenly say something wrong but after a while they correct what they said. My personal anecdote will well demonstrate this point of view. When I was at university, my physic's professor said that the inventor of wheel was David Sam. Meanwhile all studets knew that the inventor was someone else, after a while hrealized his mistake and correct it. On the other hand, in some situations professor know the correct answer but wants, students realize that or not, so you should be careful of these mistakes. The story above could easily justify my stand point.
From another aspect being respectful to your teacher also a noticiable aspect. This is not polite to interupt your teacher just for saying you said something wrong. In my point of view, students who have mature behaviour should wait until the end of class and then talk to the teacher. The story of my classmate could shed some light on what was elaborated above. He is a unpolite boy. My classmate in the middle of the lecture while all students concentrate on the topic, suddenly said that is wrong and everybody disrupted. His behaviour was really unpolite.
Taken all aspects mentioned above into considaration I pretty convined that there are many reasons to foster the idea that this is better to wait until the end of class and then talk to the professor because in this way you show your respect to the teacher, beside, the other students may not disrupt by a simple question in the middle of the class. Meanwhile, some teachers say something wrong in the class in order to determine if students attention to lecture or not. You have to be aware of these king of thricky mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...at the inventor of wheel was David Sam. Meanwhile all studets knew that the inventor was ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'situations'' or 'situation's'?
Suggestion: situations'; situation's
... correct it. On the other hand, in some situations professor know the correct answer but w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ght on what was elaborated above. He is a unpolite boy. My classmate in the middl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72826086957 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44743896082 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491847826087 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.9046930911 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107279657823 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357941760659 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634300098025 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749397377415 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342587070171 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.