aa
Owing to the major role of universities in young people's lives in the modern world, the issues surrounding universities have become a matter of speculation and dispute. One of these controversial issues is whether universities should require students to take a public speaking course or not. As far as I am concerned, taking a public speaking course should not be a necessity in universities. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the requirement to pass a course on public speaking may discourage numerous students from attending the university. Due to the fact that the majority of students do not have an experience of speaking in front of a large audience, this course may seem frightening and worrying for them. Furthermore, a number of students, specifically introverted individuals, have public speaking anxiety. Thus, this requirement would serve as a discouragement for them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. As a freshman, I was a shy person and have even socializing problems. This fact has caused me to fall behind in courses in which presenting a lecture was required. had a public presentation course been required, I would not have been able to pass the course. So, I might have left the university at the first semesters.
The second noteworthy point to be mentioned is that it is not a good decision to make students spend their worthwhile time on an unnecessary course in which a skill is taught that can be developed by its own during the time. In other words, students will learn this skill while they are an undergraduate. Hence, it is better for students to devote this time to other significant subjects which are relevant to their major. For instance, the university can offer a course to teach students how to deal with an advanced, professional software, or how to write an academic paper, instead of this course. My experience demonstrates this clearly. The time when I got accepted for a graduate degree, I did not have any problem with public speaking anymore. In fact, my problems had been solved during my bachelor study. Therefore, there was no need for such a course to help me develop my public speaking skill.
in conclusion, I firmly believe that public speaking course should not be a requirement at universities. This is because it may discourage some students to continue their education, and because it wastes their precious time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | view | |
| 2021-01-27 | attia | 76 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | shosh sa | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | aliyor00 | 3 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | shabnam.ahmadi | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worrying about'?
Suggestion: worrying about
...e, this course may seem frightening and worrying for them. Furthermore, a number of students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 685, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Had
...hich presenting a lecture was required. had a public presentation course been requi...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...p me develop my public speaking skill. in conclusion, I firmly believe that publi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, even so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93946731235 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98692596012 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506053268765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.972065372 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6956521739 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.