It is universally acknowledged that political leaders have a significant influence towards citizen's quality of life. There are often controversies over the important characteristics of a good political leaders. In my standpoint, despite the need of a combination of various skills, the most crucial and indispensable ability to be a political leader is the communication skill. I would delve into the reason behind it.
To commence with, good communication skills allow a leader to convey his or her ideology to the followers, which is crucial as citizens would only support the leader when they understand the leader's ideology. Throughout history, the best leaders among all always use their communication skills to elucidate their thought and pursue people to follow them. There is no a better manifestation than the famous leader Martin Luther King, who delivered the renowned speech I Have a Dream to the citizens which encouraged people to confront racisim, hatred, and inequality.
Some critics may point out that successful leaders need a combinations of abilities, and accordingly, communication skill is not the most important one among them. However, this lead to our second point, that it is impossible for people to master in all different area, yet good communication skills enable people to find others to help them. A political leader, when making decision, is required to consider a wide range of aspects, from economic to diplomatic impact. It is impossible for one to be an expert in all of these field, especially when considering the increasing complexity of politcal system nowadays. Therefore, a political leader often leads a team with economists, diplomatists, militarists, and many other experts to help him or her. It is therefore crucial for the leader to communicate with the teammates before making the decision.
Judging from the above evidence, it could never be overemphasized the importance of communication skills as it allows leaders to convey their ideology and enable them to lead a team to help them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'leader'?
Suggestion: leader
...ant characteristics of a good political leaders. In my standpoint, despite the need of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ort the leader when they understand the leaders ideology. Throughout history, the best ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... pursue people to follow them. There is no a better manifestation than the famous ...
^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a combination' or simply 'combinations'?
Suggestion: a combination; combinations
... point out that successful leaders need a combinations of abilities, and accordingly, communic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024691358 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12786981472 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0833317956 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223274036652 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805050403207 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633832306604 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139879174192 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310678423294 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.