Agree or disagree? Teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom. (Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion)
It is obvious that teachers play a very important role in educating students. We can say that the core duty of teachers is knowledge transmitting. Revealing the social and political views by teachers may affect the quality of knowledge transmitting. On the other hand, influencing by a teacher’s political view is not acceptable to some parents. As a result, I disagree with demonstrating social and political views from teachers in a classroom.
As I have mentioned above, when a teacher is starting to reveal his political view in a classroom, he will unconsciously affect the things that he is teaching. If a teacher is an adherent of one political party, it is possible to input that party’s point of view in his teachings. For example, if a teacher is a follower of one political party and shows his views about that party, it makes a tendency in some of the student’s thoughts around politics. It is not good for students. Most of the time, they have not exact social or political standpoints. Because of that, it is unfair to make this bias in their political views. They must be free to choose their views. For freedom in thinking, it is necessary for students to meet a variety of views and then, choose their point of view.
Another important aspect is, speaking about social and political affairs in a classroom may cause students to lose their concentration on the lesson. We know that the main purpose of attendance schools is to learn a variety of lessons. Concentration is very crucial for learning. The more concentration is available, the best result can be earned by students. Because of that, teachers need to make a good environment for students to have a good and efficient focus on learning.
In sum, when teachers manifest their social or political views in a classroom, it not only influences the quality of learning but also change the student’s way of thinking about politics and social affairs. Because of that, in my opinion, teachers should avoid speaking about their social or political views in a classroom.
- Agree or disagree? Teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom. (Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion) 60
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...bout that party, it makes a tendency in some of the student's thoughts around politics...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and efficient focus on learning. In sum, when teachers manifest their soc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, speaking about, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97701149425 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0052910579 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451149425287 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4583325695 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354666928771 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113605868639 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092509630353 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240898413071 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793016735264 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.