agree or disagree
the building are used for several purposes
In this set of materials, the reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico are used for certain purposes. While the reading states that there are three theories explain the uses of the Chaco building. However, the lecture refutes each and every reasons mentioned by the writer.
First and foremost, the reading states that the building structure are for residential purposes and Chaco are resemble the large well known apartment of native American. However, the lecture argues this by saying that it is for sure resemble the native apartment from outside but it is simply differ from inside, According to the professor, the building from inside cast doubt about the number of people live in them. If 100 people live, it should be more fire place present, but it was so little of fire place which are important for cooking at that time , this evidence that these building not used as residential.
Secondly, the reading makes the argument that other theory explain it may used for food supply storage as maize without spoiled and last for long interval. On the other hand, the lecture argues that it may be sound possible but the excavation found many of the rooms was empty and there are no trace for form of food or container founded. FURTHERMORE, THE PROFESSOR ADDS THAT why the maize found on the floor if they should restore it? Why there are no remains of large container? These question cast doubt about the accuracy of this theory.
Lastly, the reading argues that it may use for ceremonial purposes called Pueblo Alto and excavation found a large number of broken plots. However, the lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that these houses include other materials rather that used for the carmoney. Like, construction tools, sands, and rocks. Moreover, the professor states these materials are consider trush which either not used out after the building done or left it over from meals. Apparently, this theory not has defined evidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- agree or disagree technology effect the young people creativity 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in 73
- agree or disagree the franchise is better than small business 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico are used...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w Mexico are used for certain purposes. While the reading states that there are three...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
... for residential purposes and Chaco are resemble the large well known apartment of nativ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...apartment from outside but it is simply differ from inside, According to the professor...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 556, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h are important for cooking at that time , this evidence that these building not u...
^^
Line 8, column 108, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...called Pueblo Alto and excavation found a large number of broken plots. However, the lecture refu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 369, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...he professor states these materials are consider trush which either not used out after t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95535714286 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31506119067 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4228925593 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225153833594 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679013114487 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606445570773 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141561000427 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045921701203 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.