In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Discussion helps to make a matter perfect. we know that to complete a matter planning or discussion held sixty percent and execution held forty percent. Thus It is typically disputed that for any progression requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view rather than always thing positive. However, I strongly agree with this statement that in any situation for progression must be needed to discuss those people who have a reverse point of view. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, a contrast point of view about any subject that means to indicate present different and reverse claims and as a result, this contradiction actually makes progress more intense and more worthy. without any contradict party, it is the possibility that some progression has made by one point of view, as a result, some worthy think does not carry throughthis progression. For example, every nations parlament must be needed strong opposite party because it is helps to ruling party to think more before they make a decision of any matter. furthermore, without contrast point of view about any subject is sometimes difficult to figure out what is actually brings positive or negative.
Secondly, flaws could have found out of any progression, if discuss with contrast point of view's peoples. since they are always try to contrast any progression , so they try to present their concepts
and try to presevt the progressive matter and then this way helps to figure out actual flaws any progression and helps this project more perfect. For instance, in software company, before available any software in market must be discuss two different group of people. one group of is tester and others group is developer. these groups philosophy and thinking completely different.Moreover, to figure out any bag of software or to any technical flaws are tested and developed before the softwer release in market and discuss about there two groups of people they are contrast to each other. As a result by this testing and devloping groups people discussion, sofware group ensure their worthy and helps to keep their reputation in market.
Finally, contrast thinking sometimes makes some prevention to bring any progression, though, but wothout discuusion reverse thinking people could not figure out any wrong. Although, it is not always take equal consideration of opposite thinking about any subject matter but it is positive when not only discuss about one direction besides discuss among those people, they actually contrast and thinking different way.
In conclusion, from the above discussion I want to says that for progess of any matter, must be needed to discuss among people who have contrasting points of view in any situation because this way helps to figurer out any falw if and this is helps to makes a matter more persistent and more precious.
- In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in 80
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 76
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 71
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 73
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it became 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...cussion helps to make a matter perfect. we know that to complete a matter planning...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rcent and execution held forty percent. Thus It is typically disputed that for any p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
... progress more intense and more worthy. without any contradict party, it is the possibi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ore they make a decision of any matter. furthermore, without contrast point of view about a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...s with contrast point of views peoples. since they are always try to contrast any pro...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tried'.
Suggestion: tried
...of views peoples. since they are always try to contrast any progression , so they t...
^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e always try to contrast any progression , so they try to present their concepts ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...so they try to present their concepts and try to presevt the progressive matter a...
^^^
Line 11, column 252, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...in market must be discuss two different group of people. one group of is tester and o...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... discuss two different group of people. one group of is tester and others group is ...
^^^
Line 11, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...s tester and others group is developer. these groups philosophy and thinking complete...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 381, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...sophy and thinking completely different.Moreover, to figure out any bag of software or t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 52, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'say'.
Suggestion: say
...on, from the above discussion I want to says that for progess of any matter, must be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15336134454 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70160907523 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443277310924 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3366496714 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.277777778 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2777777778 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427058463563 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157349345308 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14298323708 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266527706065 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102495989892 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.