asto
Both the reading and the lecture discess wether it is convenient to have colonies in the asteroid or not. The former argues that it is easy and profitable to have colonies in the asteroid but the later disprove all the argument given by the reading.
First of all, the author contends that low gravity of the astoroid will make it easier to the spaceship for landing and a lot of equipement can easily be carried to the asteroid from the earth. In contrast, the lecturer argues that low gravity will creats loosing in muscles as well as the calcium density in the boon statrs to decrease. He also adds that even a astronuts stay only for few months in the asteroid it will make a huge damage to his health.
Secondly, the reading asserts that, the asterios are full of precious metals and it will be a great ways to income a lot of money by making buisness of these metals in the earth. However, the professors rebuts that considering the cost of mining and transfering the metals to the earth it may not be very benificial. In addition, if the amount of the metals increase the price can be drcease and it will make them less profitable then it was think before.
Finally, the text claims that, since some of the asretoids often visite very close to the earth it is easy and cheap to have colony to them and get back to the earth. On the other hands, the lecture counters that, although some asteriod come very close to the earth their orbitals are not organized like the other planets so they also visite too far that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues that, the asteroids doesn't stay close to the earth and travel such a distance that made it very costly to return back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...trs to decrease. He also adds that even a astronuts stay only for few months in t...
^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...few months in the asteroid it will make a huge damage to his health. Secondly, the reading...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
... precious metals and it will be a great ways to income a lot of money by making buis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...e and it will make them less profitable then it was think before. Finally, the te...
^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...l make them less profitable then it was think before. Finally, the text claims tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... Finally, the text claims that, since some of the asretoids often visite very close to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: returning
...ar that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...that make it become more challenging to return back to the earth. He further argues that, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... He further argues that, the asteroids doesnt stay close to the earth and travel such...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... a distance that made it very costly to return back.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48888888889 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26623089493 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0775632945 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.545454545 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 5.45110844103 247% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.