is buying a newly introduced technological device good or bad
An individual's approach to purchasing a newly introduced technological device depends to a great extent on their occupation, financial status, and their need for that device. In my opinion, it is more practical and advantageous if one can wait until some time has passed since the initial emergence of a product in the market. I will demonstrate my ideas as follows.
Firstly, as a new electronic device becomes available to the public, the errors and defects in its structure and function gradually reveal themselves. While there is no possible way to be aware of the drawbacks of a product primarily, as time passes, feedback and reviews become accessible. Hence, one can make a more informed decision. For instance, I was planning to change my cell phone and buy a new Galaxy S10 Samsung device. However, as I waited two months after its first appearance on the market, reviews claimed that the battery in this phone has technical problems and it catches on fire. So, my hesitation saved me the trouble.
Secondly, when a technological device is on the market for the first time, its price is exceptionally high. Due to the high demands and extensive sale rates, companies rely on making a lot of profits when introducing new products. By contrast, when a device is considered rather old on the market, its price declines. As an example, referring to myself and my phone endeavors, I eventually aimed to buy one from the Samsung Note series. Now my options were Samsung Note 10, a brand new technology that was high in demand, or Samsung Note 9, an older version of the same phone with virtually the same features and a considerably lower price. Guess what option did I go with?
Finally, although it can be enjoyable to be in the possession of the newest technological advances and employ them in day-to-day life, sometimes it requires a great amount of time and effort to obtain that devices firsthand. Tremendous demand in the market and stores' intentions to make the sale of the product exclusive to their own, make this mission difficult and time-consuming. For example, once I was planning to buy a refrigerator for my house and LG had recently introduced their smart home appliances. I was aiming to purchase the aforementioned refrigerator but it was not available in any store in my city at that time; it could only be found in the capital city of my country.
In conclusion, a little hesitation and waiting a while after new technological devices are available on the market to buy them can benefit an individual in many ways. Amongst them, we can name the saving of time, and money, and making a more detailed and informed purchase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
- TPO 16 independent the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 83
- TPO 12 independent focusing on one thing is better than knowing basic things about diverse majors 90
- TPO 2 Integrated 072023 The reading claims that it is better to assign a team rather than an individual for a new project However the lecturer shares an example of negative experiences of a company to reject all the ideas mentioned in the passage These ou 80
- TPO 36 independent agree or not for the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities 80
- a mistake in the classrom or meeting 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'An individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: An individual; Individuals
An individuals approach to purchasing a newly introduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86123348018 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89939552342 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4916866832 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.095238095 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163047095135 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461739047684 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573864933811 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098633931175 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320690636971 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.