Celebrities (such as actors, musicians and athletes, etc.) sometimes express their political views in public. Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities, others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebrities. Which opinion do you agree with?
In the contemporary and sophisticated world of today, some famous individuals convey their political ideas to the public, and the thoughts of celebrities play an important part in society. I agree that knowing the political beliefs of celebrities is damaging for the reasons listed below.
First, since celebrities are not political experts, their opinions are useless to the public. To be more precise, actors and sportsmen have expertise in their respective fields, but their political knowledge is comparable to that of the average citizen; hence, they are not reliable instructors. In the presidential election five years ago, for instance, one musician supported one candidate. Because this singer was well-liked by the public, they adopted his viewpoint, and the endorsed candidate was elected president. As a result of the judgments made by the incorrect president, our nation was confronted with a multitude of difficulties after a few months. When people criticized the singer, he stated that he could not grasp the terrible aspects of the individual he supported. Moreover, he admitted that he lacked political expertise. As a result of the public's awareness of the political opinions of celebrities, our nation faces several issues.
Second, superstars should not share their thoughts with the public because they do not consider the advantages to society. To clarify, celebrities do not present their beliefs objectively; thus, they think of themselves in their views. According to my personal experience, when a government voted to improve transportation systems, a prominent actor expressed his opposition. Therefore, many individuals, especially admirers, opted to follow him despite their opposition to this endeavor. After one year, the transportation systems had deteriorated to the point where citizens were unable to use them, and they had a difficult time as many of them did not own a car. However, celebrities had contemporary automobiles, so the shortage of mobility did not affect them. People would not have had to endure a damaged traffic system if they had not been influenced by the opinions of celebrities. Accordingly, many recognize that celebrities do not support their everyday concerns, and they should disregard them while making political judgments.
In conclusion, despite the fact that there are numerous reasons on both sides, I firmly feel that it is counterproductive for the public to be aware of the political beliefs of celebrities. Not only do celebrities lack adequate political expertise, but they often convey their opinions for their personal profit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 88 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 80
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...political expertise. As a result of the publics awareness of the political opinions of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49253731343 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09627456235 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549751243781 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8132656986 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27112611142 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873038906168 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745929972139 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189208258067 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541493103177 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...political expertise. As a result of the publics awareness of the political opinions of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49253731343 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09627456235 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549751243781 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8132656986 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27112611142 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873038906168 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745929972139 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189208258067 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541493103177 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.