Voting and its power is unlimited to a nation's progress. There are many examples in history of elected leaders and the nation's rise and fall. Such powerful decision needs some experience and knowledge of nation's status and need. So, I disagree that children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
To begin with, children at the age of 15 will be very influenced by what attracts them. The natural process of adolescent aging is when they will be going through the real world experiences and will be learning, adapting themselves to their circumstances. At that time, if they are given with voting rights, it contains the risk of not only their negligance towards voting but also they can be easily lured with wrong political ideas of their age interests. For instance, even though the voting rights is given to Indian children at the age of 18, the recently conducted election time survey showed the widespread ignorance of voting group youngsters about the competing parties. In addition, when they were asked whom they would vote for, most of their reply was either random choice or based on the political popularity. This shows how wrong it could go if we give voting rights to children of age 15.
Second, young age children don't understand the seriousness of voting. In most cases, they are not aware of the power of voting and the consequences of choosing a wrong leader. In some places, students vote for fun and the insta pics. This casual approach of theirs is incorporated with their adolescent behaviourism. There are so many studies proved that it is common that children at their adolescent period to be lethargic. Apart from age, the less worldly experience make it difficult for them to understand the voting and its power.
Though there are many children at their adolescents be very astute about current affairs and their nation's governmental structure, the vast group of children over the age of 15 don't fall under this category. Since a nation's progress is in the hands of elected leaders, it is essential to be careful to whom we give the power to choose those leaders. So I disagree with the idea of giving voting rights to children around the age of 15.
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 54
- The following appeared in a memo from the Board of Directors of Butler Manufacturing."During the past year , workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more onthejob accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts a 49
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University: A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for the 42
- ARGUMENT:A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f age 15. Second, young age children dont understand the seriousness of voting. I...
^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st group of children over the age of 15 dont fall under this category. Since a natio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, apart from, for instance, in addition, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81697612732 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55319886578 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511936339523 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1540562954 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5789473684 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441901675511 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153472262365 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178547644191 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288334120844 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612949428672 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.