children should know about financier management
When people become adults, they have many responsibilities. They need to learn many things. The financial responsibility is significant, whereas, they have to manage their all expense and saving. Although the plethora of people hold the opinion that children do not require to learn about money management in a sensitive age, I believe that it is essential for them, since, it will be useful for them in the future. I feel this way due to some reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, if children learn basic financial management, they will easily learn more difficult things related to it when they become an adult. The people have many responsibilities besides their job. For example, a working person should have knowledge of tax return, where to spend money, fix deposits and others. Additionally, they have to manage home expenses and their family's needs. For example, if a person has already knowledgeable about the savings and taxes from childhood, he can easily do his saving and know which company is better for the investment. Offspring are always curious about the things which are not related to them, so their parents can give information about this.
The second and the same exquisite reason for this assertion is that it helps them to understand the importance of money, since, in a young age, they do not know about the right use of money. The young are always stubborn to buy things. Therefore, if their parents teach them the importance of money, children learn how to spend money on right things. The knowledge about the expenses and spend money has been useful for the children throughout their lives. If people know the value of money, they can be a responsible financier; since they know that spend money in irregular ways can bring financial conflicts at home.
Finally, sometimes, children do misuse of having this type of knowledge. For instance, if they teach to manage their own money, they spend it to buy junk foods or doing other activities with their friends without getting the permission of their parents. They know that how to calculate money or how to use it may lead them in the wrong ways. Besides, these demerits, there are many advantages if parents guide their children in a better way.
By the way of the conclusion, I think that parents should teach their children about money management, so they would able to manage their salary with expenses of home and their families as well as they know the importance of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...he opinion that children do not require to learn about money management in a sensitive a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'managing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: managing
... knowledge. For instance, if they teach to manage their own money, they spend it to buy j...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, as well as, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90330188679 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5845258208 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452830188679 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9250389121 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248361050506 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752607456506 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579218017239 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16840765721 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419350878012 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.