Digitizing medical records
The reading and the lecture are about the possibility of Digitizing medical records and the pros and cons. The author believed that it's a good idea due to economical benefits and scientific benefits. The lecturer however believed that it's somehow impossible to achieve those goals even with digitizing medical records.
First of all, the author mentioned that digitizing medical records will save money and eliminate extra expenses and that can save a lot of money for the hospital and health care system. However, on the other hand the lecturer believed that digitizing the records will not reduce the costs because the doctors will keep paper records too. also, there are some offices like insurance companies that with use paper documents with the patients’ signature on it
Secondly, the author claimed that using digital record would be safer because it will reduce human error. For example, maybe the patient forgets to accurately provide information so that the doctor will miss some parts. The lecturer on the other hand mentioned that digitizing medical record will not completely reduce human error because doctors always take notes while visiting a patient and because of a bad hand writing most of the doctors have, it may cause some problem in saving the patient's records.
Finally, the author mentioned that digitizing will help the doctors all over the world to have access to patient's documents and it would be beneficial, while as the lecturer said, the author didn't take privacy into account that all of patient's documents are private due to law and they can't share them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Khalil 1998 | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...pros and cons. The author believed that its a good idea due to economical benefits ...
^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...or believed that its a good idea due to economical benefits and scientific benefits. The l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mical benefits and scientific benefits. The lecturer however believed that its some...
^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...he doctors will keep paper records too. also, there are some offices like insurance ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... while as the lecturer said, the author didnt take privacy into account that all of p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...cuments are private due to law and they cant share them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11877394636 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38206354734 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1236018542 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.444444444 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 5.45110844103 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330997322343 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168580616567 0.076458572812 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135793483997 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222574753459 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109898301127 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.