There are different opinions on whether maintaining deep friendships with a small group of people for a long time is more suitable for people and brings them joy and happiness, or people's ability to make many new friends without any trouble. Despite the fact that some people think happiness stems from having a deep bond with a tiny group of intimate friends, I believe otherwise, maintaining that nothing is more effective for people to achieve internal consent and satisfaction than their capability to cultivate new friendships with new people. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that in the hustle and bustle of today's world, people do so many things simultaneously; for instance, they have to go to university, at the same time, they must work, they have to allocate some time to their family, and so forth. They usually do not find enough time to spend with their friends. People cannot build deep, long-term relationships with their friends if they do not dedicate adequate time to their friends. Consequently, they end up with precarious and shallow relationships with a small group of friends, about which they have to be worried all the time since if they lost their friends, they would find it hard to make new friends. Having the ability to expand their nearest circle, people can meet new people, and they do not have to allocate significant time to them. Also, they reach inner happiness and calmness because they know they can always make new friends in case they lose their previous ones. Thus, this reason manifests the importance of the ability to make new friends.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is about experiencing new things. Each person has his unique personality, and people can experience new things with new people. Experiencing new things, most of the time results in happiness and joy. Take my own experience as an example. Before improving my ability to meet new friends, I had known few people. We met each other only at weekends and used to play video games. But now, I have many friends with different interests. Every time I experience new things with them, for example, last week we went mountain climbing which I had never experienced before. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that meeting new people and making new friends help people experience new things, which leads to increasing their level of happiness.
All in all, many people are in favor of maintaining friendships with a small group of people. They believe that having a relationship with a tiny pack of friends over a long period of time can bring them happiness. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that not only is making new friends more viable in today's complex world than holding friendships for a long period, but also it yields people new experiences resulting in increasing their happiness and consent.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 75
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 80
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest fi 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with a tiny pack of friends over a long period of time can bring them happiness. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69571901866 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472868217054 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9919391969 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377100818251 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129441066271 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896210358773 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284760240706 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866008251159 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with a tiny pack of friends over a long period of time can bring them happiness. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69571901866 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472868217054 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9919391969 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377100818251 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129441066271 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896210358773 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284760240706 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866008251159 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.