Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advice from older friends is more valuable than that from friends at the same age.
Friendship is universally acknowledged as the most valuable treasure one may possess in whole life. Warm-hearted friends always offer us their precious advice when we are in need, no matte they are older than us or at the same age. A general controversy arises when advices from that two kinds of friends are presented together. Some attaches greater importance to advice from older friends than that from ones at the same age, while others lay emphasis upon peers’ advice. There is no universal agreement on which one is superior to another, but rather that both of them are indispensable to our lives.
On the one hand, advice from older friends should be treated seriously. Among countless factors which directly or indirectly influence the value of an advice, the richness of adviser’s knowledge and experience is conspicuous. How can you expect a person who even don’t know how to cope with the problem you are facing herself/himself to provide helpful tips? Impossible! Apparently, an experienced person is more likely to offer useful suggestions than a novice. The friends older than you are just this kind of experienced people you are looking for. As a proverb says, the death of an elderly man is like a burning library. This comparison vividly demonstrates that the older a person is, generally more knowledge deposit she/he has. From this aspect, the older friends are worthy of asking help for.
One the other hand, the value of advice from friends at the same age should also be mentioned. I suppose that most of our friends are at the same with us, so their advice takes a prominent position in our lives. At least, this is true for me. As a result, there is a hidden possibility that I have no advice to follow in some situations, if not listen to their advice. In the case that they are your only hope, you should already know how precious their advices are. On the top of this, the friends at the same are the friends knowing you most. They and you have grown up in a similar environment and experienced similar life, which lay a foundation for the universal consensus between them and you. So it is more easy for you to accept their advice and opinion. And they are more familiar with the problems you encounter and able to understand your situation more easily.
Judging from the arguments mentioned above, I would tend to reiterate my standpoint that there should be no prejudice against either advice from older friends or that from friends at the same age. In my mindset, they are equally valuable in my life and I will adopt any useful advice regardless of the age of advisers.
- Recently some students need to arrive at school early in the morning. Some people think that starting school day early is a good approach to support learning, while others think it should be a better idea for students to attend school at a later time. Wha 76
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, children rely too much on the technology like computers, smart phones and video games for fun and entertainment while playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When working on a project, it is better for classmates or colleagues to communicate face to face than sending emails. 76
- In your opinion, what is the most important characteristic (for example, honesty, intelligence, a sense of humor) that a person can have to be successful in life? 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, look, may, so, while, at least, i suppose, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80132450331 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64705410014 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487858719647 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8595834084 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487193009042 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139586380045 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112397715351 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316213713021 0.150856017488 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036769805261 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.