The issue of whether universities should manage the curriculum for the students has triggered public interest. Some people say it should be compulsory for all students to take part in history classes because learning this subject helps them to have a better understanding of the world while others argue that historical knowledge is useless to our lives now. For me, it is necessary for all students to take history courses due to the following reasons.
First of all, learning history makes college students cherish more about normal things they obtain in life. Nowadays, college students tend to ignore the small, but meaningful things in daily life. However, learning the history and development of a certain thing allows students to realize what rough process their ancestors have been through to make sure they can live a peaceful and happy life. For example, I had a bad habit of leaving the light on even when the room is empty. After a history class where I learned that before Edison invented the light bulb, people read with candles or under bare sunlight, the inconsistency of the light source made it very hard to distinguish the words. However, under those severe circumstances, they still worked hard. I came to realize the preciousness of the light and get rid of the bad habit.
In addition, this can make the student develops a sense of belonging and pride towards their mother country. By acknowledging the tough process of those wonderful achievements, students tend to feel proud of their ancestors. All students in China are proud of their four great inventions thanks to the emphasis of compulsory history courses from primary to high school. Thus, there is no reason for not setting the history class, which can result in the enhancement of patriotism in college students.
To sum up, I think all students should study the history subject because this helps them cherish things in life and be proud of their country.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, i think, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99692307692 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58901822794 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.025309624 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.266666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215127578447 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724983332561 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054256657509 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145436012163 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407160358598 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.