Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is
From a general point of view, people tend to attend university to broad their knowledge and skills, besides promoting their social position. Therefore, the subject of university courses is one of the most controversial subjects, which often provokes many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that students studying in all fields should pass history courses, whereas others dismiss this idea. It is my firm conviction that taking history courses must be mandatory for all students regardless of their field. In what follows, I thoroughly elucidate what rationale my perspective is based on.
The first and the foremost reason is that history is definitely the foundation of virtually all fields, specially, social science. As a matter of fact, different part of the history, comprised of political, human, geographical and even artistic parts provides a basis for subjects and events being discussed in many majors. My own experience as an architectural student is a compelling example of this. As I have mentioned, my major was engineering and artistic which has nothing to do with history at first glance. However, surprisingly, history is one of the most determining factors in comprehending the architecture of all nations. Obviously, perceiving the causes which had given rise to particular lifestyle of people, social circumstance and so on that formed the different architectural styles, is not possible without studying the history of that particular nation.
The second pivotal vindicating point I should mention here is that even if the major is not directly relevant to the history, students as community member are required to be familiar with the history of their own country or the country that want to study or live in later. It is an indisputable fact that history has made up the culture and civilization in whole regions. Therefore, hardly individuals are capable of understanding the current culture, society, and compatriots' attitude and believes without having a sufficient knowledge of history. Furthermore, the current social and political circumstance of each country is tied to its own history and other nations' history as well. Hence, history is crucial and determining in conceiving and, even, predicting the countries present and future status.
To put it in a nutshell, studying history should be compulsory course for all majors. Clearly, this is due to the fact that not only history is the basis of almost all fields, but also should all individuals have a satisfying knowledge of history to better understand a country's political, social, and so on status.
- likely disadvantages of selling fossils to the private sellers 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 95
- frog population decline 80
- TPO 46- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 90
- decreasing salinity of the lake 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he history, students as community member are required to be familiar with the his...
^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ry is tied to its own history and other nations history as well. Hence, history is cruc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32281553398 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99508170535 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531553398058 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6252101163 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315618142462 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948109445852 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762821923423 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195969130929 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681669399005 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.