Obviously, in this fast-paced and sophisticated world, there are innumerable factors that are essential for companies to conduct them in order to be prosperous. An inevitable question which has always been the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is whether spending an enormous amount of money on advertising is effective for companies’ successfulness or not. A number of people adhere to the notion that companies and plants should put tons of money on advertising in order to have a boom in their business, which I concur with. In the following, I will elucidate my rationale by advancing two reasons.
The first paramount point to be mention is that currently, companies have to compete in harsh conditions because of lousy worldwide markets. Clearly, nowadays, many banks in different countries are going to be bankrupt. As a result, people do not spend money and buy products like several years ago. Therefore, companies have to stick to advertisements to satisfy customers to buy. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this reality. Last year, I wanted to buy a new computer, but I did not sure about it because I did not want to spend my money. Then, on the internet, I saw many mesmerizing advertisements about a specific brand of a computer. These fascinating advertisements made me to spend money and purchase the computer. Had I not seen the advertisements, I would not have bought the new computer.
Second, people are more prone to buy products, which had been advertised. Interestingly, many people trust advertisements, so genius companies distinguish that they should spend as more they can on different creative advertisements. The more one product is seen in the advertisements, the more it will be sold easily. As a proof to these points, a cutting-edge and comprehensible investigation undertaken by a number of eminent researchers in the University of London’s business center demonstrated that companies which try to advertise their products on tv do not have any crisis about selling their products, and after advertising a product on tv, its demand will increase up to sixty percent. This evidence apparently indicates that advertisements are practically efficacious.
In brief, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that it is extremely effective and efficient to put a vast amount of money on advertisements in order to have a flourishing business. This is because it will be compensate for lousy economic conditions, and because people trust in advertisements.
- A company wants to use money to help employees work better One way is to improve the technology equipment computer printer used by employees and improve efficiency Another way is to redesign the space to make the working environment more comfortable 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 60
- 5 Aug Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rationale by advancing two reasons. The first paramount point to be mention ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not have bought the new computer. Second, people are more prone to buy pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ements are practically efficacious. In brief, all aforementioned reasons and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24938875306 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35184728642 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511002444988 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9167775272 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.35 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198053442242 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557299023315 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426962859578 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119848693136 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273678283366 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.