Companies have a leading role in countries economic development, and the primary constituent elements of each company are its employees. Following that, the controversial question which arises here is: would it be a good idea if the companies pay for their employees to educate at universities? Some people are inclined to the notion that companies are not responsible for their employees’ education. However, since supporting employees for having a superior academic degree could result in higher competitiveness of the company and stronger commitment of the employees, to be the best of my knowledge, I agree with this statement.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that as time passes, the amount of competition among companies will increase, regardless of in which area they are working. Therefore, companies need to perform jobs in the best way, and they may require new ideas to enhance the productivity of each task. One approach to fulfil these requirements is to invest in improving employees’ knowledge. On the other hand, universities are the most excellent institutes for boosting expertise and creativity. Consequently, in case that a company pays for employees for getting a degree at a university, it will increase the company competitiveness, particularly in the long-term view. So, not only will the money back to the company, but the company net profit also will increase.
Alongside augmentation of the company competitiveness, putting money into employees’ education, give the employees the sense that their employers care about them. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Since I was a child, my uncle has been working for a company named Kayson which now is one of the biggest companies in the field of civil engineering. As I remember, the Kayson company has funded my uncle to graduate in Master’s degree in construction management at Sharif university. Now, it is about 20 years later, despite many valuable work suggestions during these years, my uncle is still working at this company. As a result, another advantage of investing in workforce education would have to be increasing employees’ loyalty to the company.
Thus, with the above in mind, funding employees to get a higher degree in universities is essential for the futuristic company executives who want the allegiant workforce and competitive products.
- TPO6 3
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (so 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 78
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What’s your opinion 76
- Which one of these abilities do you think is the most important for a high school teacher teaching students ages 15-18 to have?- The ability to give students advice to plan for their future;- The ability to find which students need help and provide them w 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32041343669 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25886613017 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6289995023 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.117647059 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279218583707 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909139125357 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751399078466 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189979144406 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708019254423 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.