As some people may hold the view that todays' eating habit is healthier than the past's diet; however, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the past time's food were healthy. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reasons which advocates my idea is the hectic lifestyle and its negative effects on the people's eating habits. It is lucidly obvious that nowadays the people have the high tempo lifestyle, they are in rush to suite with this speed. This fast tempo forces them to sacrifice their individual stuffs such as social communication, and dining. They mostly prefer to spend fewer hours for the preparation and eating food. Mostly, the unhealthy food such as a fast food, which contains the huge amount of fats and low value of nutrition, is a decent option for this situation. Consequently, this eating habit paves the path to the serious health issues.
The second reason is the proliferation of the fast food restaurants. As it mentioned above the fast food is named as one of the unhealthy meal choices; however, there are the bulks of the fast food restaurants with various and attractive campaigns which appeal the people to eat the junk food. In this case, the fast foods have the priority in the people's selection. According to the noteworthy intelligible research conducted in my country, in Tehran the availability of the fast food restaurants in the city is sixty percent more than the traditional food restaurant. Hence, the chance of choosing the unhealthy fast foods is 1.6 fold more than the healthy traditional foods.
The last reason which confirms the accuracy of my perspective is that the manufacturing process which lead to unhealthy food option. Unfortunately, based upon the population expansion and their huge demand for the food sources, there are an undeniable requirement to the industrial usage in the food sector. In the food manufacturing there is a list of chemical substances used to preserve the food for long duration; however, they contain lots of the negative sides-effects. So these substances lead to the lot of health issues.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead to the conclusion that nowadays the people possess unhealthy eating habits in comparison with the past diet.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 73
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club Do you agree or disagree that a person s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for Use reasons and examples to support your position 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...the fast foods have the priority in the peoples selection. According to the noteworthy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'requirements'?
Suggestion: requirements
...e food sources, there are an undeniable requirement to the industrial usage in the food sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10301507538 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8060827503 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8069076347 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.894736842 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259238396954 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832856972909 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517860688568 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146238519333 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495259340923 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.