Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
There is a great debate about whether the government should spend more money on access to the Internet or to public transportation. I believe that the latter option in many cases is the more important issue than the former one. In this essay, I will address some advantages of enjoying a developed public transportation for a city.
First of all, spending more budget on public transportation could lead to a healthy atmosphere. For example, I would prefer to use a public transportation for going to work and coming back to home if it was available. Because this is the easiest and fastest way I can reach to my workplace on-time without wasting more time. As a result, I have not to use my own personal automobiles to travel which finally caused to have a healthy atmosphere.
Next, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, without a developed public transportation people have to use their own automobiles that would face them in some problems such as traffic. Traffic not only cause to air pollution but also put citizens in stress. For example, when I lived in Tehran two years ago, I had always stressed because I had to wake up at 4 o’clock and it took 2 hours to reach my workplace. Wasting daily 4 hours to go to work and come back to home is a great stress that a person may experience.
Last, an economic growth is possible with a developed public transportation. When a city has more factories, it needs more workers also. It can be inferred that the cities with more factories enjoy a denser population per unit than a small town which has a little number of factories. So, factories would be established around the cities when only the city has an appropriate public transportation. For example, when I was working in Tehran, at the first 1 year that I had not enough money to buy an automobile, I had experienced some problems because public transportation was not available. Such situations would encounter factories with lack of enough workers. As a result, the factories could not produce merchants with appropriate costs. Therefore, they could not keep up with other factories that can produce merchants with appropriate prices.
In conclusion, I believe that having a developed public transportation not only cause to decrease in air pollution and traffic but also cause to grow in economic. So, it is more important to be noted by the government to allocate enough money for this section.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-31 | Springlovers | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 73
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never before experienced. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today’s world. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The telephone has a greater influence on people’s lives than Television has. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s more factories, it needs more workers also. It can be inferred that the cities wit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'growing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: growing
...ir pollution and traffic but also cause to grow in economic. So, it is more important t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82211538462 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97062479731 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3714772004 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5238095238 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8095238095 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205189698937 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695523756571 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883525552379 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126486082803 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958703059711 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.