Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments have a wide variety of priorities in their financial help assignment. They have to cover the whole country with different needs in a way that should be not only harmless but also the most profitable one. The permanent debate in this field is which field is more beneficial for government in order to received higher financial support. The question which is raised here is that whether it is better for governements to pay much in support of arts rather than in support of athletics. In my vantage point of view, supporting athletics by assigning higher financial resources to them is more profitable for governments in comparison with art works. In what follows, I will elucidates the most paramount reasons in this field.
The first and foremost reason that should be mentioned here is that the assigned money to athletics will be back to government in more profitable way. The country which invests in improving sports facilities and sponsoring teams are more likely to be approved by international committee for holding great sports competitions such as Olympic. The amount of spended money by government in this way is much less than its profits. For instance, during World Cup competitions innumberable individuals come to the country for watching games. These visitors purchase not only their basic needs such as food but also the secondary staffs like traditional handicrafts. Such phenomena would be a great achievement for every government. Moreover, recent studies reveals that tourism industry have a decisive role in each economy growth in modern world.
The last but not the least reason is that government investment in supporting athletic will encourage more people to do sports and physical activities. The more people attracted to sports, the more healthier society member a country has. If individuals observe the governments' financial supporting of athletics, they tend to be athlete. The most important cause that makes it difficult for people to go to the gym is financial concerns. Due to this fact that athletics were not wealthy in the past times, they do not have desire to be a poor one in their life. But if does the government pay specific attention to supporting athletics in wide variety of life aspects, they will become a successful world athlete who will be able to attract financial investors from all over the world. Such investors would bring their investment in athlete's home country; consequently, athletes and government both benefit from it efficiently. A case in point, national team players in Olympic competition attract sports production companies in order to establish a new branch of their company in their country. This company will be advantageous in varied aspects: from employing new workers to increasing economy growth.
In brief, the governemnts should investing more in supporting athletics than in supporting arts since this is more beneficial for them in many ways. The reason is that holding a sport competition brings lots of money for government. Moreover, successful athletes will become a lesiouner and improve country's prestigue.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.tpo51 70
- TPO54 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 29Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 683, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'elucidate'
Suggestion: elucidate
...with art works. In what follows, I will elucidates the most paramount reasons in this fiel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at sports competitions such as Olympic. The amount of spended money by government i...
^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...he more people attracted to sports, the more healthier society member a country has. If indivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2620.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.250501002 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87761595276 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488977955912 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.034174107 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.56 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274489620819 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815286097883 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776381354856 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192325742266 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500840423385 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.