Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is one of the most essential needs of us in contemporary life. Many people thus propose quality education. Paying a lot of money to university professors is an effective strategy. For they think financial payments can advance the scientific level of education. While money plays an important role in the academic ambient, I disagree that paying much money persuades professors to improve education scientifically. My point of view is based on scientific and economic aspects, which I will explore in the following passages.
Scientifically, paying a lot of money for them creates a toxic atmosphere among professors where they stop doing profound scientific research, which is an inseparable part of academic communities, leading to competition for money negatively. My experience is a compelling example of this. Our university doubled the salary of professors to motivate them to do innovative studies. While the university speculated this encouragement will lead to a change in the scientific level of education gradually, the members of the faculty engaged in indefinite competition for grasping much money. Had not they increased salaries unreasonably, the professors would not have forgotten their scientific duties.
From an economic perspective, spending money without comprehensive planning, like in the salary section, causes to a budget deficit. The universities can allocate their budget to research groups or laboratories, in which increasing money will improve their circumstances and will affect the qualification of education. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University, in which they claim that as the universities increase the rate of allocating financial resources to laboratories and various research, the level of education will rise strikingly.
To sum up, not only does it pay much money to faculty members will decrease the level of education but will cause to have a financial deficiency in other domains. The universities should spend their financial resources on fundamental needs to improve education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 77
- playing a computer game is a waste of time. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only people who earn a lot of money are successful Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only people who earn a lot of money are successful Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 43
- It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62300319489 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24800572373 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0299717892 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261806758951 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898385399483 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052716380334 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163644091981 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031997980534 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.