Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.

Many People choose to have a broad knowledge on different subjects, while others prefer to specialize in a certain science branch. Personally, having a broad knowledge is better than specializing in one specific. I believe in this way for two reasons.

First pf all, all science branches are connected somehow together, and it is necessary to understand physics and have access to different Math subjects such as Calculus, ALgebra and etc. For stance, my friend is a good observer and he induce awesome conclusion from his observations. consequently, this guy decide to specialize in the physics without give any attentions to other related branches like Math, despite these subjects are mandatory for his studying. As results, he fails to reach to his goal to be a famous physics scientist. Giving more attention to single subject could be obstacle in your success path.

Secondly, world changes rapidly and the most attracted job today could be obsolete tomorrow, so one should have the ability to adapt quickly and to do not be very restricted to a single specialization. My uncle, for example, was one of the most notable engineer in the designing analogue TV sets, and he was desirable to many large companies at this time. As the world starts to shift to digital TV sets, he refused to learn a new thing, so he become obsolete like the analogue TVs. Having a broad knowlage would be easier to shift to the new field and do not loss your prestige in the industrial life.

To sum up, having a broad knowledge could be useful to connect different science branches to reach your goal. Also it easier to shift your career when it is necessary.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
Many People choose to have a broad knowledge on different subjects, while others pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
...tain science branch. Personally, having a broad knowledge is better than specializing in one spec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...Math subjects such as Calculus, ALgebra and etc. For stance, my friend is a good observe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'induces'.
Suggestion: induces
...ce, my friend is a good observer and he induce awesome conclusion from his observation...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...esome conclusion from his observations. consequently, this guy decide to specialize in the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nt science branches to reach your goal. Also it easier to shift your career when it ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71398711679 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5085939419 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205335206225 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780045348215 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932589249831 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132982561808 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837439025601 0.0645574589148 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.