Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge in many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowledge acquisition becomes critically important in today world due to the mounting complexity of the societal structure and the thorough transformation triggered by technology in almost every domain requires people to possess greater amount of experience and erudition. A person can choose whether to focus on a specific subject or obtain cognition from different fields, with the utmost goal to achieve employment and creates impact to his/her society. The knowledge about various subjects shows the merit to equip learners to gain versatility or quickly adapt to the changing nature of their profession, and providing a broader view about their focused subject.
In this uncertain world where changes take place every day in every sector, the knowledge in different fields offer a person the capability to get adaptable to every change. He can better seize the favorable opportunities when it come with his ready preparation. For example, a mathematician possessing a certain amount of knowledge about economics and some of its related topics can shift his profession to become a businessman and also harnessing his erudition in mathematics. A person who knows about different matters is easily change his opinion and avoid holding any prejudices that may hinder him from obtaining his success. Indeed, having certain amount of exposure to various subjects prevents him from biased perspective which is addressed to be a critical impediment for a businessman. Furthermore, the ever-changing nature of the society requires a man to know about different fields to successfully handle distinctive situations. For example, in daily life one encounters with numerous problems outside his own profession, thus, getting it prepared is an absolute advantage. Consequently, gaining exposure to different domains proves to be beneficial for every person from different majors.
The broad knowledge in different subjects provides a person with different approach and perspective once handling a problem that he can find the most efficient manner to tackle it. Some argue that the in-depth knowledge in a field equips one with more methods to address the issue. It is reasonable that the comprehensive understanding of a problem furnishes a person with thorough consideration in its approach and it facilitates him to make the sound decision. Nevertheless, the high dependency of different matters necessitates a person to get knowledge about different domains on approaching a situation. Specifically, one subject often requires the involvement of various experts in different fields and each of them must attain some exposure to other's specialization to coordinate efficiently. For example, a psychology professor working on the project of identifying students' behaviors should gain some experience and knowledge about education and class activities to converse with teachers and students in the process of conducting his survey. All in all, the broad range of knowledge in different subjects offer one the thorough consideration when facing with a problem.
In conclusion, the rapidly-changing nature of the society takes place in every field requires each person to have knowledge in different fields rather than completely focusing on his own profession, indeed, the wide range of knowledge and experience enhances one's flexibility in addressing different circumstances and facilitating his performance of current major.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Andrew1507 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge in many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- What is your approach to problem-solving, how does it works for you? Use specific details to support your response. 73
- Pets should be treated like family members Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons to support your opinion 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...ize the favorable opportunities when it come with his ready preparation. For example...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...knows about different matters is easily change his opinion and avoid holding any preju...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ge of knowledge and experience enhances ones flexibility in addressing different cir...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2911.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63056092843 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16083750796 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508704061896 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 923.4 618.680645161 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3458169162 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.210526316 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2105263158 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153181282232 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552944663192 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428783845096 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103699204803 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420479990698 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 11.7677419355 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 58.1214874552 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 86.8835125448 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.