Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is more beneficial to have a variety of skills for different academic fields than to have just limited one on specific field. I totally agree with we should have a wide range of different experience in academic fields. I feel this way for two reasons which I will examine in this essay. First, different experience of different fields opens the people mind to such different level of brainstorm. Second, this type of experience will affect the business market by fortifying any business success.
To begin with, multiple skills of different academic majors will help our student to think differently. The students who have these skills, they can invent new way of experiences. For instance, most of successful humans in our daily have multiple majors. Seven years ago, my cousin had studied biology as his major, then he studied business as a major. Last year, he invents a big laps series in California; therefore, he had both the experiences. At the end, if he had not these multiple experiences, he could not think differently by inventing his big laps series.
Furthermore, a variety of skills will increase any business market by guaranteeing the business success. Most of the companies’ jobs require different type of experience. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Since 2016, I have been living in the United States after my graduation as a dentist from Egypt. I came here to looking for job, I did not find anyone accepted me. Obviously, I had to take another major. Additionally, After I finished MBA, I opened big company of dental supply beside I work as a dentist. My company continued to increase, right now more than 1500 labors work there. If I did not have these skills, I could not open my company and hire more than 1500 labors.
In conclusion, multiple skills are better than one specific skill in the academic fields. Firstly, different major offer new way of thinking like the example before. Secondly, these types of skills will strengthen any kind of business.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 3
- wildlife of birds 70
- airships vs airplane 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...iness as a major. Last year, he invents a big laps series in California; therefore, h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95882352941 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76942026087 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2073373786 48.9658058833 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3043478261 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7826086957 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108492399672 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332497915696 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539900407176 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768032280327 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447803976056 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.