Essay topics
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject
Greater the knowledge, higher the value of the person. In other words, having broad knowledge helps to suceed in the career. Therefore, I am consonant with the statement that it's better to have diverse knowledge rather than having knowledge of one specialized subject. I think this way because of two main reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, the knowledge of the various fields aids us to complete tasks succesfully. In fact, it makes our tasks easy and efficient to accomplish. My personal example is best explanation of this. When I started working on a road project at Sankhuwasabha, there were many difficulties to deal with; different cultural and religious beliefs was one of them. As I was aware of the Tamang Culture, it helped me alot to get along with the communities there; eventually, making easier to adress the problems associated with the land excavations. Finally, the peoples there were eager to help me and in our activites, which consequently, made it easier to complete the project within given time-frame. Thus, having diversified knowledge is really advantageous.
Secondly, having broad knowledge makes easier to get job. In other words, lack of extra information can badly affect in our career and even lose our jobs. For instance, for a nurse, it is essential that, he/she is well informed about the psychology of the patients and have knowledge about the good manners, and also behave in polite and appropraite manner by understanding the patient's pain. If nurses speak rudely and agressively, then they might get fired from the job. And also, they should constantly update themselves with the latest technology and information. Only by doing this, they can continuously perform well in their job and succeed in their career.
To recapitulate, having diverse knowledge is very crucial to success as mentioned in the above paragraphs. Therefore, I strongly agree with the idea in the prompt.
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 3
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the mos 50
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 70
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ient to accomplish. My personal example is best explanation of this. When I started wor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15673981191 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88845575681 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601880877743 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9534963797 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5789473684 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227367555716 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621379814656 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903901795508 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142005642178 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873612750381 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.