Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In today’s progressive world, Academic subject are expanded in the whole world with variety of specialization in each field. Also, scientists believe that, being as a professional person and concentration in individual fields need more time than usual maybe whole the life of a person. However, they think every person enable to get knowledge in the particular subject, spending the time in other topics is a useless activity. I am of the opinion that, following the information in most of the subject a few, is better than to be expert in the specific field. The reasons to support my idea are illustrated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, being as a multitask person, is an advantage for succeeding in this modern world. In this regard, the people who have knowledge partly in most content, can enhance in their career. According to their widespread of vision, they can work in different matter. Therefor, if they had experienced in certain field, after a long time they could quit and start a new job with new experience. For instance, When I had worked in a company as a computer technician, I had felt exhausted and bored after 6 months so I left my job and run my gallery. Definitely, I had not being a professional as a artist but as bit, I had known how to work with colors.
Furthermore, exploring in several topics, make the opportunity to meet different people with different background. To be more specific, you get a connection with people who have a various vision more and it increases your imagination and problem-solving. For example, when I had studied in the university at engineering department, I had communicated with the aesthetic field students and that was a impressive experience, because they look at every thing in a defferent way and noticed something new. So this helped me to think better about nature, and it changed my ideology.
In conclusion, having considered the above-mentioned reasons into account, that achieve the knowledge in a vide range of subjects is better to be pore on the particular field. Consequently, We should say the key of successful people are related to the wide ability of them to learn everything.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 599, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tely, I had not being a professional as a artist but as bit, I had known how to w...
^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e aesthetic field students and that was a impressive experience, because they loo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93732970027 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.052520344 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558583106267 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.532577783 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182981273076 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589260797451 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603374204668 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111900805342 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671090739179 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.