Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Throughout history, human beings changed the way they choose their habitats. For ages, people abandoned nomadic lifestyles and started to settle down in permanent locations. However, still many people believe in a new form of mobile lifestyle that suggests it is better to move from one place to another instead of having a permanent location. I firmly agree with this idea, and I prefer a non-stationary lifestyle over living in one town forever. Two elaborate reasons are discussed in the following to substantiate my viewpoint.
Firstly, my conviction is that living in different locations enables us to meet new people from different cultures. In other words, moving to new cities provides a valuable opportunity to get familiar with new characteristics and personalities. By having interaction within societies with unique conventions that are not the same as those in our home town, we gain new experiences. Moreover, being exposed to unfamiliar groups fosters our interpersonal skills, as we thrive on making new connections and consolidating our bonds with new individuals. Not only this effort extends our social circle, but also brings more enjoyment to our life. On the other hand, by being a perpetual resistance of a town, our life turns into a dull routine, since we miss a significant source of excitement resulting from unexpected events.
Secondly, I believe that changing cities helps us be more prosperous in our profession and life, because it enlarges our perspective. It is only when we step out of our comfort zone that we can grow mentally. The indisputable fact is that each new city brings fresh challenges which affect our mindset and alters how we perceive the world. Thus, it transforms our interpretation of the world around us, by making us aware of the matters we have been neglecting during our sedentary life. As a result, with a sharper mind, we catch valuable professional opportunities. As I graduated from university, I left all my connections and job options in a college town, and I moved to a new city that was bigger and had better working opportunities. I made a great effort to make new connections and apply for the latest job positions. Although it was hugely arduous for me to adapt to the environment at first, working in a larger company brings more prosperity for me in the long run. Had I not stepped out of my comfort zone, I would not be able to work in a famous corporation that guarantees my future success.
According to the reasons mentioned above, it can be concluded that moving from one city to another has some fruitful advantages for those people who are more willing to take risks and leave their comfort zone.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 78
- Spartacus 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by email they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- what is the most important discovery or invention made by human beings in past 200 years 60
- 65 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97995545657 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96220506648 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559020044543 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0758879428 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.476190476 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196301675014 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573991319427 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064057742661 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135071956441 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503792973534 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97995545657 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96220506648 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559020044543 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0758879428 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.476190476 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196301675014 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573991319427 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064057742661 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135071956441 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503792973534 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.