Rhinoceros
Today, Rhinoceros is in danger of extinction since its horns are so valuable that they attract more and more hunters to poach them and make a considerable profit out of them. The passage suggests three ideas protecting Rhinos from hunters and saving their population. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the effectiveness of the methods proposed by the author.
To begin with, some people suggest that it may be a bright solution to dehorn Rhinos in the wild. In this practice, they cut Rhinos' horns in their habitats to make them less appealing to poachers. The author points out that this approach causes no harm to these animals since it can be done with the help of medical equipment and drugs. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that this method is neither practical nor good for Rhinos. She argues that not only is this method time and money consuming, but also it reduces the chance of survival for Rhinos. It is due to the fact that Rhinos use their horns to dig holes, find food, and protect their territory from invaders.
Adding to that, the author posits that people should be educated about the benefits of Rhinos' horns. The essay mentions that Rhinos' horns are made up of Keratin. So, there is nothing unique or magical about horns. Despite that, the lecturer holds the opinion that people will not pay attention to the information provided by scientists. She argues that this method is unlikely to be persuasive since it is an ancient belief in people's minds that Rhinos' horn is a medicine for many diseases.
Last but not least, the author speculates that governments should legalize the sale of Rhinos' horns and start to sell their abundant sources of horns. In this way, they can reduce the price of horns by intensifying their availability. Adding to that, today, many people do not involve in the trade of horns since it is illegal. The low prices cause by government offers will discourage hunters from selling horns. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that legalizing governmental sales will attract more and more people to hunt Rhinos as it makes a lucrative and legal market. So, she concludes that the effects of this method are unpredictable and may have adverse repercussions.
- 63 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there s no need for the government to help them 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 73
- Plain of jars TPO 59 83
- 65 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 83
- what is the most important discovery or invention made by human beings in past 200 years 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...rs from selling horns. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that legalizing governmental ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 379.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86807387863 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48859806892 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522427440633 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8064458876 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0271554926348 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00718640286156 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313248038411 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0263684404812 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456714786299 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.