At present, teachers are being wished to not only teach students in effective ways but also be popular with students. Whether a popular teacher can be effective in assisting students in learning arouses a heated debate. Some people assert that it is extremely challenging for educators to strike a balance between effectiveness and popularity, whereas others hold the opposite viewpoint. Frankly, the former standpoint, I believe, is more reasonable, especially when the quality of courses and teaching materials is taken into consideration.
Students, in general, prefer energetic teachers as opposed to strict teachers. In other words, if a teacher wants to become popular and be liked by pupils, they need to sacrifice being strict to students. As a result, students' learning efficiency will undoubtedly deteriorate significantly. Take my middle school music teacher as an example. My music teacher wanted to be friendly toward her students. She frequently spotted her students spacing out and gossiping during the class but owing to the fact that my music teacher wanted to maintain her popularity, she chose to tolerate her students' misbehaviors. Unfortunately, since most students were inattentive throughout the entire lecture, nobody had gotten a score higher than B-minus on their final exams. Contrarily, my high school math teacher, Mr. Lieu, was exceptionally strict; he required his students to do ten diabolical math problems every week. Thus, even though most of his pupils performed well on their midterm math exams, every student, including me, portrayed him as an unforgettable evil villain. Evidently, it is a dilemma for an educator to find a balance between popularity and learning productivity.
Conspicuously, the quality of teaching materials is highly related to students' studying efficiency, but once a lecturer becomes popular, he/she might incorporate amusing yet unrelated content into the material. As a result, the decrease of tourse quality will undoubtedly result in students' worsening effectiveness. As an example, my father is a high school history teacher. One day, my father bumped into a research paper stating that the degree of funny facts in an educator's teaching materials is significantly proportionate to an educator's popularity, so he decided to include intriguing historical facts in his history notes. Nevertheless, students were too obsessed with these funny historical stories that they tend to forget the important historical facts that they should have learned. That is, students have problems identifying which section of the history material is essential to their study. Eventually, even though my father become popular in his school, most of his students perform incredibly terrible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ways but also be popular with students. Whether a popular teacher can be effective in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
...ls is significantly proportionate to an educators popularity, so he decided to include in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, in general, of course, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56937799043 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03631779469 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581339712919 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8974656296 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232523561595 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760644218672 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671539606975 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173555820559 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704940457343 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.