Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Through history, public transportation has always played a prominent role in an individual’s lives regardless of the type of public transportation. It is indisputable that public transportation may have affected our lives in several aspects. I advocate the issue which the government should spend a huge amount of money to improve public transportation. The number of benefits over this issue are overwhelming I would explore some on the main benefits which are more conspicuous for me in the following paragraphs.
The first significant point to be mentioned is that the widespread use of privet cars can contribute deleterious problems through our city such as depleting natural resources, and government can do a lot to counteracts this problem by encouraging people to use more public transportation instead of using the owing cars. As you know car depend on fossil fuel which is not renewable, we act as if we have unlimited natural resources but this is not true as we used them up they gone forever. So it is necessary that we use public transportation in order to save a huge amount of natural recourses.
Another interesting point which deserves some words is that Traffic congestion has been a long-term situation which exacerbated by lack of infrastructure of transportation, this kind of problem would ameliorate by establishing new caps and buses. for example, last week me and my friends went to the cinema but due to the traffic congestion it took a long time to get to the cinema, by the time we got the cinema the movie had been started, therefore, if our government had improved our public transportation I would have reached to movie on time.
Due to aforementioned reasons, I have explored above I do believe that spending money on public transportation is of more importance than internet access on the ground that it will reduce traffic and air pollution and also will result in the development of the country. I hope someday our authorities concerned with public transportation come to their senses and take proper measures to fortify it.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ate by establishing new caps and buses. for example, last week me and my friends we...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, for example, kind of, such as, you know

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23972913611 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546783625731 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4836667748 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.272727273 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222148037917 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842749611441 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646366945969 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130349918706 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484786852585 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.