Nowadays, it is indisputable that the teachers have greatly played the pivotal roles in teaching and guidance of students. The views differ considerably when it comes to the issue of whether universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Some people take the view that the universities should spend more money on professor’s salaries in order to in order to improve the quality of education. on the other hand, other asserts that it is not necessary to spend more money for university professor because they think material consideration is not important for them. As far as I concerned, I concur with this statement because I think money is the main incentive for all the people in order to do their obligations. The number of benefits over this issue is overwhelming. I would discuss some of the main benefits which are more conspicuous for me in following paragraphs.
The first significant point to be mentioned is that although the minority of professors have opted this carrier because they want to contribute something valuable to society but the majority of people have selected this job due to a high salary. Form my perspective money is the main incentive for people to work harder and fulfill their obligation regardless of their social castes which will engender to improve the quality of education. The statistics show that the people who get a higher salary from universities are more likely to pay more attention to their job than those people do not get an adequate salary.
Another interesting point deserves some word here is that the increase in salaries also helps professors to keep on one job and do their best. Usually, a professor has to have at least three works to make enough money to pay bills. Thus, they won't give the best of them in class. Instead, they just go to perform mediocre classes. In other words, professionals of education feel discouraged in these jobs. If the university could provide a better salary, professors will be able to stay in just one school and give the best of them giving outstanding classes. Hence, schools could have more benefits by paying more to their workers, specifically teachers. my personal experience is a compelling example of this issue, in my country pay increments have been very low due to financial crises so the professors who regarded as higher castes of our country had to meander throw a lots of ordinary job in order to earn some money which caused deleterious effects on our society such as poverty a joblessness became more prevalent.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, I’ve discovered above I advocate of theory which university should spend more money on salaries for university professors because both student and professors will take advantage of paying increments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...er to improve the quality of education. on the other hand, other asserts that it i...
^^
Line 1, column 820, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... issue is overwhelming. I would discuss some of the main benefits which are more conspicuou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...o their workers, specifically teachers. my personal experience is a compelling exa...
^^
Line 3, column 875, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...tes of our country had to meander throw a lots of ordinary job in order to earn some m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y a joblessness became more prevalent. Due to the aforementioned reasons, I&apo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, thus, as to, at least, i think, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03887688985 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85645947433 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494600431965 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2329641275 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.789473684 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280801130619 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881027495513 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960803838367 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188378241869 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100503912725 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.