:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt with the modernization and advancement in society the whole world becomes a global village. In this regard, telecommunications devices and technological breakthroughs are of paramount importance that has provided us with the facilities which break the barriers between space and time. There are different schools of thought to acquire information and keep one's self updated from the surrounding. Where some people reckon that watching and reading news from sources that have similar points of view clears the mind, Others contemplate that reading or watching the news from other perspectives is important to gain knowledge. As for this writer, I will subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason corroborating my viewpoint is associated with the issue that when people read a news presented from another's point of view it results in gaining the knowledge. To be more specific, its always important to knew the both perspective of any information.It is obvious that acquiring knowledge and holding beliefs are not easy for anyone. people reaserched their time and efforts to reach to a point, so listening other opinions express one's openness.It is worth mentioning that sometimes people provide with astonishing information that are good to know as it will provide an opportunity to you to think out of box. As a case in mind, My dad takes great interest in politics and he always watched the opposition party news. That clearifies his mind that what is the big picture of the story. If he had not watched the news, he would not gain any knowledge about opposition party.
The second rationale behind my reason is rooted in the fact that knowing other perspective and reading news from opposite point of view provide you a chance to check the authenticity of personal view, IT is notable that people feel more confident, as they researched the truth.It goes without saying that people clear their mind and held their beliefs strong and sometimes they even counter plan after knowing the other agendas.By the way of illustration, last year when my dad heard the news about his opposition political party , he had known that opposition party is making adirty scheme aginst them by telling wrong things about their party. My dad instantly prepared the plan to clarifuies hios position that extremely boost his confidence and position in his party. It is crystal clear that checking news increase the confidence of individual.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that knowing something from another viewpoint is the right way to strengthen the knowledge. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, It will broaden the horizon of a person's knowledge. Second, Person will boost the individual confidence as they check th
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...thought to acquire information and keep ones self updated from the surrounding. Wher...
^^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...the both perspective of any information.It is obvious that acquiring knowledge and...
^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uiring knowledge and holding beliefs are not easy for anyone. people reaserched t...
^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...lding beliefs are not easy for anyone. people reaserched their time and efforts to re...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nt, so listening other opinions express ones openness.It is worth mentioning that so...
^^^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ng other opinions express ones openness.It is worth mentioning that sometimes peop...
^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...confident, as they researched the truth.It goes without saying that people clear t...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...er plan after knowing the other agendas.By the way of illustration, last year when...
^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ews about his opposition political party , he had known that opposition party is m...
^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...First, It will broaden the horizon of a persons knowledge. Second, Person will boost th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, as for, by and large, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83183688362 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531779661017 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 131.162604461 48.9658058833 268% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.315789474 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8421052632 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216863514385 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572974242421 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804838237136 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129930320822 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776322952477 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.