The way that government exploit it`s budget is always a controversial issue. While some people, particularly youngster, think that improving Internet access should become a priority the government rather than improving public transportation, I definitely disagree. To me, the government should allocate more many to facilitate public transportation, for many reasons that I will elaborate in the following essay.
First, without advanced public transportation students and workers can not reach their destination on time which will indeed affect their performance negatively. By having smooth effective public transportation different society divisions will become more productive. For example students in a rural area who does not even have a smart phone or computer can use public transportation to get to their schools. Therefore, it more important to them to have convenient mean of transportation than providing them with internet access. Even parents who rely on buses to get to their work to make money for their daily needs, would have better benefit from easily accessible transportation system rather than from Internet line.
In addition, improving public transportation will boost the overall society`s lifestyle. people can access People cannot afford to buy personal automobiles all call taxi cabs, however, they can access internet in the public spaces with no cost. Moreover, by using public transportation instead of personal cars, can decrease air pollution and car accidents. In contrast, providing more people with Internet may affect their health negatively, as they will spend more time on smart devices.
To sum up, taking in consideration the aforementioned points, I totally disagree with the statement that, it`s more important for the government to ameliorate Internet access than to improve public transportation.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 85
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- birds 80
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...t the overall society's lifestyle. people can access People cannot afford to buy...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety's lifestyle. people can access People cannot afford to buy personal aut...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 15.1003584229 7% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 275.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79272727273 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17299347672 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0096331602 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35181486916 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126535492349 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949441680771 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245873501697 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926980372065 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.