Societies around the world have various thoughts about people who migrate to other cities or countries. In this regard, some are of the opinion that migrating another residence would pave the way to lose our old and close friends; however, some others believe thoroughly in an opposite way. As far as I am concerned, I subscribe to the idea that changing the place of residence enjoys more merits than staying in a particular place. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will develop in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, nowadays, thanks to significant technological changes, people can communicate with their acquaintances in no time using telephons and social media apps. Accordingly, they would never lose their friends, and they would always feel their support behind themselves. Hence, this matter should not frighten them and they should feel themselves free to go wherever they like. Drowing from my personal experience, my best friend has applied to one of the best universities in the word, which is located in the city of Milan in Itay. We have never lost our connection, and we mainly talk to eachother on the internet. Whenever I feel depressed or face with some thought-provoking situations, I call her and ask for her help or motivation. As a result, I believe these days, due to technological gadjets, distance cannot seprate people anymore.
Secondly, by moving to other places people can find new friends with different cultures. It is worth mentioning that communicating by the same group of people every day, would make people conservative. people need to talk to different kinds of individuals with various perspectives and culturs to avoid being prejudiced about different aspects of life. I have to admit that my personal experience has profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. My uncle has lived all his life in a single town and never had changed his place of residence. This phnomenon has made him a prochieal person who do not support any changes. For example, in past, women were not allowed to ride bicycle in their town. In this regard, whenever he saw a woman on bicycle now, he gets angry and refuts them. Had he moved different places or connected with larg amount of people, He would have been more open to changes.
In conclusion, in light of the reasons mentioned, I firmly believe that it is beneficial for people to move different places, and this would not cause them to lose their friends. I feel this way because not only can people stay connected with their friends by technological equipments and softwares, but also they can find more friends and make their acquaintances broader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an opposite way" with adverb for "opposite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...however, some others believe thoroughly in an opposite way. As far as I am concerned, I subscribe ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ry day, would make people conservative. people need to talk to different kinds of indi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...o not support any changes. For example, in past, women were not allowed to ride bicycle...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97742663657 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80005990867 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55079006772 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1951779812 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.227272727 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215283218311 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593653081379 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565462027005 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135050640525 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587074012798 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.