Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is time we all relied less on private motor vehicles to get around, and instead used other forms of transport. Use specific examples and details to support your answer.
For many years private transportation has been serve for people not only as a tool to commute, but also as a sorce of comfort. I personally disagree with the statement that people now rely less on private motor vehicles. The reasons why I hold this stance will be elaborated in the paragraphs below.
One of the reason is that even in some parts of the world people do not have any alternative to the private vehicles. For instance, thos who live in the contry side of the United Stated simply are lack of any kind of transportation to substitute their own cars. There is no evolved public trantportation system. If the government sponsors development of the public transportation in these areas, people will have more opportunities to move around. Dispite on some advantages of using private cars, busses could help people in situations when the own vehicles cannot be used, such as when it breaks down. To that end, certain groups of people in particular regions still depend on private vehicles tremendously.
Another reason is that people like comfort, which private motor vehicles are enable to provide. Modern cars have a myriad of technology, which let people to enjoy driving. For example, all modern cars include air-conditioners for mantaining temperature regiment, GPS- systems for navigating in the unfamiliar for a driver areas. Therefore, complectation of the contemporare motor vehicles makes the driving process marvelously pleasant, forcing people to purchace even more cars. If people give up on their own cars, they will lose these comfortable conditions, providing by cars. Although scores of social programs are for decreasing using private vehicles in order to protect our planet from pillutants, people continue driving their own cars in the same degree. So, advantageous of using private cars overweight advantageous of using public transportation.
To recapitulate, I feel that nowadays frequenty of using private motor vehicles by humans is still enormous. This is because some areas are lack of other tipes of transportation and own cars provide people with highly comfortable and enjoyable conditions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- It is more important to have a job you enjoy doing than a job which pays well How far do you agree with the statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 60
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...mfort, which private motor vehicles are enable to provide. Modern cars have a myriad o...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y comfortable and enjoyable conditions.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in particular, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27941176471 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0081938275 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5993551525 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180392176796 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648591995368 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627329172576 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129420594407 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237614241526 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.