Nowadays, with the develpment of technology, more and more children can access to digital products since very young. Recently, there is a heated debate on the relationship between parents and children, some people hold the opinion that parents learn more from children than children do, for the reason that they lack the ability to keep up with the informative era. However, from my point of view, parents still have a strong ability to influence children and guide them to grow up well.
To begin with, parents are good teachers for children because of their experience and knowledge, which is formed through dozens of years’ studying and interaction among people. To be more specific, education, working experience and living skills can not be obtained only by one second. Equipped with all these stuff, parents are definately more experienced and knowledgable than their children who come to the world for only a few years. Just as an old saying goes, ‘ parents are the first teacher of children’. It is parents that teach the children how to dress themselves up, how to use chopsticks and how to spell their own names; It is parents that build up a harmonious family for children, which protect them from wind and rains; It is parents that help children to recognize different Chinese characters, various colors and multiple plants. In addition, apart from life skills, children will also acquire a variety of life lessons from their parents. For instance, after graduating from college, I would love to get together with my friends more often, however, none of them have time to hang out with me, causing me to be very frustrated, and even wondering if I have done anything wrong making them annoyed. Then, my mom patiently talked with me for over two hours and gave me her suggestions that I should move on, because young people nowadays were only focused on their own work, and paid little attention to others. After the talk, I felt so much relieved. Thus, I am convinced that parents' advice is still useful.
Besides, although children are born among the technology equipments, parents also have the ability to manipulate all these electrical stuffs, which means that both the children and parents do well with this morden environment. Technology development don’t affect the learning ability of human beings. Not only can young peole keep up with the lattest technolohy, adults can also fit with the artificial intelligence. For example, my grandparent, a retired 90 years’ old teacher, get up early every day to watch the lattest news in front of the television, learning what happend around. When we have breakfast together, he introduces all the fashion news to us, which we youngsters don’t know. Therefore, despite the older people may have difficulties catching up with the learning rate of youngsters, young people can still learn a lot from them.
In conclusion, I strongly hold the opinion that children learn more from their parents in the modern times.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04637096774 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61544004565 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550403225806 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5182120294 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.15 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452485351171 0.236089414692 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141480797895 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118078735236 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342415582264 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958377674338 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.