There have always been a plethora of serious problems for human beings to deal with; some problems are particular in every region and every era, and some of them are global. Solving these problems is a complex issue. In my opinion, it does not seem possible to solve these important problems within our lifetime, and I will explain my viewpoint in the following essay.
First and foremost, human has always been struggling with poverty and hunger for centuries, and eradicating them, needs elaborate plans and takes decades to be solved. Unfortunately, in the modern era, in spite of the ever-increasing development of technology, many people suffer from poverty and hunger. Especially in the third-world, the population of poor people who do not even eat food once a day is considerable. Most of them live in slum areas with insanitary conditions and without hygienic water supply, so they are vulnerable to dangerous diseases. This serious problem has not happened suddenly; it is rooted in many countries for a long time. Solving this problem takes a long time, even if all the contributing factors would be provided.
Moreover, some environmental problems have happened during a large time span, so they need a vast amount of time to be solved. One of the most serious environmental problems is global warming, which threatens every living thing on the earth. Global warming is mostly caused by greenhouse gases that are released into the air. These gases are emitted by cars, factories, and some agricultural activities. Unfortunately, many governments do not take serious decisions because they have to restrict their industrial activities and allocate a considerable amount of money to environmental research groups to ameliorate the situation. However, they evade doing such activities, because that would decrease their profits. Solving the global warming problem needs the cooperation of all countries and defining environmental regulations, and, of course, dedicating a considerable budget. Even if this happened, global warming would not be completely solved. In fact, it would probably be controlled to a limited extent. As a result, solving global warming is not likely during our lifetime.
In a nutshell, I believe that serious problems in the world cannot be solved during our life span. This is because poverty and hunger take a very long time to be solved and because environmental problems like global warming are more serious to be solved in a short time.
- Elementary School intends to extend the science time for children aged 5 11 reduce music and art time ask for consent What is your opinion Do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problems in today s world will be solved in our lifetime 70
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 56
- Your school wants to improve the quality of students life in the dormitory Which one of the following do you think the school should build in dorms Quiet study area A quiet place for study Exercise room for students to keep physical well being Room for en 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Except for doing homework parents should limit the use of children under the age of 13 on electronic devices such as computers and mobile phones 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, third, in fact, of course, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25125628141 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92941119739 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510050251256 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1564677091 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5238095238 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247484226155 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763848144224 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544998560316 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172267973603 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463805777532 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.